5 Reasons the US lost the War in Afghanistan

Exclusive, Featured, Features
October 9, 2012 01:01
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE

On 8 October 2001, US-led Coalition forces started an intense aerial bombardment campaign under the banner of “Operation Enduring Freedom”. US warplanes and cruise missiles targeted key Taliban and Al Qaeda sites in Afghanistan. Clandestine teams of US Army Special Forces and CIA operatives were sent in to support the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance as they advanced on Kabul.

Following is the list of top US weapons used routinely during aerial bombardment in Afghanistan against a rag-tag militia that had nothing more than Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPG-7), anti-tank missiles, AK-47 and other insignificant weapons:

rockwell b1b bomber afghanistan

Photo - Taylor H

Tomahawk Cruise Missile

Manufactured by Raytheon – a Massachusett-based defence contractor that employs 72,000 people and stands as the 5th largest military contractor in the world – cruise missile is a long-range, jet-powered projectile launched from navy ships and submarines. The missile uses global positioning system (GPS) technology and computer mapping programmes to hit its target. It
 costs $600,000 each and weighs around 1,350kg. Cruise missiles have a 
range of around 1,600km and travels at around 885kmph.

Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM)

Boeing manufactures a special kit that fits on the tail of a conventional 450kg or 900kg bomb, which is guided by GPS. The system is capable to hit targets with precision despite bad weather or longer distances. When attached to a bomb or a missile it covers a range of 25km. It costs the US Army about $21,000 per kit.

Cluster Bombs

Cluster bombs or munitions are weapons that on impact disperse several hundred smaller munitions – also known as bomblets – over areas the size of three football pitches. The US military refers to it as “firecrackers” or “popcorns” as they cause many small explosions in the target area. According to Stop Cluster Munition Coalition, US dropped at least 1,228 cluster bombs containing 248,056 bomblets during its 2001- 2002 bombing campaign in Afghanistan. The estimated cost of each cluster munition unit is around $15,000.

B-1B Lancer

Manufactured by Boeing, the warplane is a long-range bomber that can fly round-the-world bombing missions. It was initially built to carry nuclear bombs but the US military now uses it to unleash conventional bombs. A four-member
crew (aircraft commander, pilot, offensive weapons officer and defensive weapons officer) fly the bomber at a speed of more than 1450kmph and carry up to 80 conventional bombs, 30 cluster bombs and 24 guided “smart” bombs. It costs the US Air Force around $200m for every B-1B Lancer aircraft.

B-2 Spirit

Also known as the stealth bomber, the Northrop Grumman’s B-2 sports a unique wing shape, and is manufactured with special materials that are designed to make it difficult for enemy radar to track.
This lethal flying machine is capable of covering high subsonic speeds of around 1200kmph. B-2’s crew of pilot and mission commander carries around 18,000kg of bombs and operates within a range of 11,675km. The USAF buys the warplane from Northrop Grumman at an estimated cost of about $1.3bn.

B-52 Stratofortress

The B-52 is known as the US Air Force’s workhorse bomber. Manufactured by Boeing and deployed back in 1955, the warplane is able to drop or fire a wide variety of bombs and missiles up to 31,500kg and can fly 14,000kms without refueling. Thanks to its airborne refueling, the bomber can fly around the world with a speed of 1050kmph. The estimated cost of the American bomber is around
$74m.

After having a look at the above-mentioned weapons and latest warfare equipment, it is easy to understand why the results of the US aerial bombing campaign were swift and decisive, besides being extremely lethal.

Afghan Taliban militia collapsed and seemingly vanished within weeks. The US special and regular forces arrived on Afghan soil to take control of all strategic assets of the country. On the other hand, CIA forces entered Afghanistan to direct anti-Taliban forces, including the Northern Alliance, and to provide assistance to covert US Army and Air Force units to transport equipment into the country.

Article Global Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Eli Pets

This article was written by on Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 1:01 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Tags:

23,449 Comments

  • It was comprehensive and detailed feature, thanks dear Moin.

    The bitter facts about this war that were said in this feature was a fact that is ignored with men who make a bridge of dead bodies of innocent Afghan people that their pockets always be full of dollars.

    The Middle East is a region that the flavor of its oil absorbs the capitalist who for filling their accounts ignore the human rights. In fact in my opinion they wanted to have a first step in this area so 9/11 was the best reason for entering to the region and then other countries.

    The weapons that they used on head of poor people were really terrible. Imagining that how each of them destroyed the lives of Afghan children and disappear the smile of their parents is a bitter fact that American, the invaders ignored and ignore because of their dirty aims.

    Thanks again for informative features …

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • The U.S. is neither the first nor the last to lose the war in Afghanistan!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • perpetual war is the goal

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Making Change

    its no wonder that the US has shunned the UN process. refusing to be accountable to the world, but holding jurisdiction over it all. yes, a very calm and exact article.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • from the point of view of the ones staging the drama… loss of lives dont matter. the number of humans ARE the only capital in today’s world. the only disposable resource.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • very very interesting and important articl, thank u so much brother Moign Khawaja

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • I better not say anything…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • no one truly ‘wins’ a war…. :(

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

    • I disagree that it’s even a war. Just an occupation of a portion of a country (forever) so that a gas pipeline can cross through. The problem is – that there needs to be supply-routes and these are getting attacked a lot by the Taliban.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • good article overall
    but just one point, on page 3, about civilian casualties, while I agree with the points u made, I find it didnt tie in properly with the title: WHY the US is losing
    other than that
    good

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Nice one Moign!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • right. Colonial wars for resources and plunder, then they ask “why do they hate us

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • good one moign! would wait for the next issue. what appears to me as the most basic few points are a) lack of idea about local culture; b) lack of idea about local terrain; n c) lack of resources to ‘defeat’ the taiban. we all know that they were scattered (retreated to their stronghold in pakistan to regroup) but were not defeated. another thought occurs to me… u can read about it when u read the sample chaps that i’d sent to you; that is…. this is one huge staged drama.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Well….. I really don’t “like” this, but I’m glad you posted it! Thanks Moign.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • its the poppy fields..our so called government is in the drug business..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • I guess there aren’t any winners in any war.

    Susan

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • hello there and thanks for your info. I have certainly picked up something new from here.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply


Kashmir Diaries: Torturous life of a former Kashmiri militant

November 28, 2011 1,188 Comments

In 1990, he crossed the ‘Line of Control’ for arms training with an aim to liberate Kashmir. But little did he know that he would not be recognised as a militant but a drug addict. As he sits in a corner of a dimly-lit room, the ashes of smoke swirl in open air. A feeble looking Gulzar in loose blue jeans and a hand-woven baggie sweater gives his character a clumsy appearance. But, he doesn’t give any impression of suffering […]

Continue Reading →

Citizen: Being a Pakistani

October 7, 2010 16,930 Comments

Sajjad Bukhari is an educated 30-year-old businessman who belongs to the country’s repressed and shrinking middle class. He gives us an intimate glimpse of his life which, like millions of other Pakistanis, is a mixture of problems, ambitions, traditions and hopes.

Continue Reading →

New Day, New Year

March 19, 2013 10,145 Comments

A photo essay on one of the world’s most ancient new year festival

Continue Reading →

Libia: La Otra Parte de la Historia

October 8, 2011 11 Comments

Incluso antes de que el conflicto empezara en Libia, la imagen del mandatario libanés Muammar Gaddafi estaba marcada de por acusaciones de tiranía, brutalidad y autoritarismo. Hay una opinión general de que el antiguo coronel del ejército libanés administraba sus asuntos con mano dura sin lugar para el disentimiento. Sin embargo, la reivindicación de una revolución en busca de la democracia y la justicia derrocando el régimen de Gaddafi por las revueltas populares en los países vecinos de Túnez y […]

Continue Reading →
Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins